Privacy and Security Notice
DQO Home
Why do DQOs
Decision Flowchart
Purpose & Goals
Directives
EPA Comments
How to Do DQOs
Procedures
Key Elements
Scoping Checklist
Workbook
Sampling Cost Advisor
Training Course
ERC VSP Training
Sample Plan Demo
Field Analytical Methods
Perodic Chart
Data Quality Assessment
Contacts
Glossaries
Related Sites

DOE EH-31 DQO/DQA Training
Course Evaluations and Commendations

Evaluation from Wayne M. Glines
DOE RL RADCON Management
Richland, WA


March 21, 2002

Sebastian, Jim, Mitzi, Al,

Let me once again congratulate all of you on putting together and presenting an OUTSTANDING course on the functions and implementation of the Data Quality Objectives (DQO) process. The energy and sincerity you bring to this course give it a vitality that raises it far above a mere presentation of data, information, or process steps. You clearly show how the DQO process can be used to significantly improve the efficiency and defensibility of decisions and actions to remediate and release contaminated sites.

DOE has been repeatedly criticized for its inability to establish and meet realistic goals for the clean-up and closure of its contaminated sites. The estimated cost and schedule for DOE to complete clean-up and closure of these contaminated sites has continued to escalate. DOE recently completed a "top-to-bottom" review of its Environmental Management (EM) Program. This review concluded that one of the primary reasons DOE has been unable to establish and meet realistic clean-up goals has been the lack of systematic planning. The DQO process provides an established, systematic means by which DOE can plan, implement, and document the clean-up and closure of its contaminated sites. I believe that consistent application of the DQO process at Hanford, and across the entire DOE complex, would provide a real opportunity to achieve the cost and schedule reductions for which DOE is striving in its EM mission.

Consistent application of the DQO process will require that not only the project managers and technical staff directly responsible for discrete projects, but also the senior management responsible for strategic planning and prioritization be aware and knowledgeable of how the DQO process can help achieve a real acceleration of the EM mission. The course that you presented was directed primarily towards project management and technical staff. I would strongly encourage you to develop a companion course or presentation directed towards senior management to show how the DQO process can significantly help to achieve DOE EM's ultimate goals.

Other than expanding the time allocated to the course in order to provide additional discussion of specific examples of how to apply the DQO process (very difficult to do in today's busy work environment), I have no specific comments on course improvements or modifications. The course is essentially an overview/introduction to the DQO process, and not a "how-to" course. I would recommend that that distinction be made clear to course attendees. A course on actually applying the DQO process to a given project would take far more time than most individuals have available.

I certainly plan to strongly advocate (require?) the use of the DQO process for any clean-up or closure projects for which I have any responsibility. I look forward to continue to communicate and learn from all of you as I progress through such projects.

Wayne M. Glines, CHP
Sr. Technical RADCON Advisor
Program Manager, Rad. Site Services
DOE-RL/OSS
(509) 376-6506
wayne_m_glines@rl.gov

 

Return to Course Evaluations

 

DQO Home Page     QE3C Home Page       Top of Page

Decision Process   Purpose & Goals   Directives   EPA IG Audits   Procedures/Processes  Key Elements
  Scoping Checklist   Workbook   Sampling Cost Advisor  DQO/DQA Training Course
 ERC VSP Training Course   PNNL Visual Sample Plan Demo  Field Analytical Methods
Periodic Chart of the Isotopes  Data Quality Assessment   Contacts   Glossaries   Related Sites



DQO Coordinator, Sebastian Tindall, (509) 845-7078.

Privacy & Security Notice